Keeping a senior security role open costs a company roughly $100 to $150 per day. A 90-day vacancy bleeds…
Lara B. — Building Cyberr
Keeping a senior security role open costs a company roughly $100 to $150 per day. A 90-day vacancy bleeds over $10k.
OK, why?
It sounds counterintuitive that a vacancy costs money, but it's quite logical.
When a senior engineer leaves, their work doesn't vanish, it gets reassigned to the rest of the team.
Mid-level and junior engineers are forced to "context switch" constantly to cover senior-level tasks they're not fully qualified for, which slows down their own core projects. Forcing a team to operate at 120% capacity for 3 months creates massive retention risk, and paying overtime or swallowing the lost productivity of an exhausted team easily costs $30 to $50 a day.
When a senior security professional is missing, the Annualized Rate of Occurrence (ARO) of a successful cyberattack ticks upward, because the defensive posture weakens. Without a senior architect optimizing the system, Mean Time to Detect increases. A minor malware intrusion a senior would have caught in 20 minutes might sit undetected for 4 days. That exposure is hard to price, but conservatively it's $30 to $40 a day.
And in fractional delays, compliance bottlenecks, and third-party contractor costs to patch the gap, companies lose at least $40 to $60 a day in pure momentum.
This exact math is why specialized external recruiters can command $30k+ placement fees. They show enterprise leadership that paying a premium to close a senior role in 30 days instead of 90 saves the company thousands in unmanaged risk and operational friction.
But that's the old way. And in 2026, we're breaking it into pieces.
5 reactions · 2 comments
Comments
Lara B.: The $30k fee isn't really the problem, the 90-day timeline is. That's where the cost is. Recruiters start the search after the seat opens. We're doing it the other way round: building the senior security network beforehand, so the people are already there when you need them and speed stops being something you pay a premium for.
Samantha S.: The risk is huge - I would say these numbers are extremely conservative. Burnout is very very real even with a full staffed team, and when there are staffing gaps it adds more pressure.